Skip to main content

The ARCO Channelview Explosion (1990): A Call to Action for Robust Asset Integrity and Process Safety

Image
By

The ARCO Channelview Explosion (1990): A Call to Action for Robust Asset Integrity and Process Safety


Introduction:

The 1990 explosion at the ARCO Channelview facility in Texas remains a watershed moment in the history of process safety. This devastating incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential for catastrophic consequences when asset integrity and process safety management systems fail. By examining this tragedy through the lens of the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) framework, we can extract critical lessons that demand unwavering attention in the oil and gas and chemical processing industries.

Accident Summary:

During the startup of an off-gas compressor, a wastewater tank containing process wastewater contaminated with hydrocarbons and peroxides exploded. This tragic event was triggered by a combination of factors:

  • A temporary oxygen analyzer malfunctioned, failing to detect the accumulation of a combustible atmosphere.
  • The regular nitrogen purge, a vital safety barrier, had been reduced during a maintenance period, increasing the likelihood of a flammable mixture.


The restart of the compressor led to the ignition of the flammable mixture, and the subsequent flame flashback resulted in a powerful explosion. This incident caused the deaths of 17 people and inflicted an estimated $100 million in damages.




Accident Causes (RBPS Perspective):

Analyzing the accident through the CCPS RBPS framework reveals a breakdown in multiple layers of protection:

  • Direct Causes: The immediate triggers of the explosion were the failure of the oxygen analyzer and the reduction of the nitrogen sweep, which went unnoticed by operators.
  • Latent Causes: These direct causes were rooted in deeper systemic failures within ARCO's process safety management system, particularly within the Manage Risk pillar:
    • Element #10: Asset Integrity and Reliability: The absence of a robust preventative maintenance program for safety-critical equipment, such as the oxygen analyzer, was a fundamental flaw.
    • Element #15: Conduct of Operations: Inadequate risk management for auxiliary operations (like the wastewater tank) and insufficient monitoring of safe operating parameters contributed significantly to the incident.



Key Lessons Learned and Expert Insights:

The ARCO Channelview disaster provided invaluable, albeit painful, lessons that continue to shape industry best practices. Drawing from my experience in implementing and overseeing asset integrity and process safety programs, I want to emphasize the following:

  1. Asset Integrity and Reliability: The Imperative of Proactive Management

    • The ARCO incident unequivocally demonstrates that safety-critical equipment must be rigorously identified, and comprehensive preventative maintenance programs must be in place to ensure their reliable operation. The reliance on a single, unmaintained oxygen analyzer proved to be a fatal flaw.
    • My Perspective: Throughout my career, I've championed a proactive approach to asset integrity. At OMV Yemen, I directed the Corrosion Management Framework (DST-0291), which achieved a 30% reduction in equipment failures across 2,300+ assets. This success underscores the power of a well-defined and diligently executed asset integrity strategy. Furthermore, the pioneering of risk-based inspection (RBI) programs at OMV, resulting in 3,650+ days without Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) incidents, highlights the effectiveness of prioritizing inspection efforts based on risk.

  2. Conduct of Operations: Beyond Mainstream Processes

    • Safe operating parameters must be clearly defined, consistently monitored, and strictly enforced. Critically, the ARCO tragedy highlights that risk assessment and management cannot be limited to core production processes; auxiliary systems and operations must be subjected to the same level of scrutiny.
    • My Perspective: My experience championing 23 API/OSHA-compliant process safety standards and achieving a 15% improvement in audit scores emphasizes the importance of a strong process safety culture and rigorous adherence to established procedures. Moreover, orchestrating hazard hunting campaigns to proactively identify and mitigate potential hazards, reducing near-misses by 15%, underscores the value of vigilance across all operational areas.

  3. Redundancy and Resilience in Safety Systems:

    • The ARCO incident starkly illustrates the danger of single points of failure in safety-critical systems. Design engineers must prioritize redundancy and resilience to ensure that safety functions remain available even in the event of component failures.

Conclusion: A Continuing Commitment to Safety


The ARCO Channelview explosion was a tragedy that instilled profound changes in the way the industry approaches process safety. It reinforced the absolute necessity of robust Asset Integrity and Reliability programs, meticulous Conduct of Operations, and resilient safety system design. As professionals in this field, we have a continuing responsibility to learn from the past, apply those lessons to the present, and strive for a future where such incidents are prevented.






Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding LV Earthing Systems: TT, TN, and IT Explained

By
Understanding LV Earthing Systems: TT, TN, and IT Explained Earthing systems are crucial for electrical safety, protecting people and equipment from faults and shocks. In low-voltage (LV) installations, the IEC 60364 standard defines three main earthing systems:  TT, TN, and IT , each with distinct characteristics and applications. This blog post explains these systems, their subtypes, and key safety considerations, referencing the attached technical screenshots for clarity. 1. Classification of LV Earthing Systems Earthing systems are identified by a  two-letter code : First Letter: Neutral Connection T (Terra)  – Neutral is  directly earthed  at the transformer. I (Isolated)  – Neutral is  not earthed  or connected via high impedance (≥1000 Ω). Second Letter: Equipment Earthing T  – Frames are  locally earthed , independent of the neutral. N  – Frames are  connected to the neutral , which is earthed at the transformer. 2. Typ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding Short-Circuit Analysis with ETAP and the IEC 60909 Standard

By
U nderstanding Short-Circuit Analysis with ETAP and the IEC 60909 Standard Introduction: Short-circuit analysis is a critical aspect of electrical power system design and safety. It involves calculating the magnitude of fault currents to ensure the proper selection of protective devices and to verify that equipment can withstand fault conditions. This post will discuss how ETAP software performs short-circuit analysis in compliance with the IEC 60909 standard, a key standard in this field. Why is IEC 60909 Important? The IEC 60909 standard provides a globally recognized framework for calculating short-circuit currents in AC power systems. [Ref: IEC 60909-0:2016] Its importance stems from several factors: Ensuring Safety: Accurate short-circuit calculations, as mandated by IEC 60909, are crucial for selecting appropriately rated protective devices (circuit breakers, fuses) that can safely interrupt fault currents. [Ref: Short Circuit Analysis (IEC 60909 Standard) : Extent & Requir...
1 comment
Read more

Understanding Short-Circuit Calculations in Electrical Systems

By
U nderstanding Short-Circuit Calculations in Electrical Systems Introduction: Short-circuit calculations are fundamental to the design, protection, and safety of electrical systems. Determining the magnitude of fault currents allows engineers to select appropriate protective devices (like circuit breakers and fuses), ensure equipment can withstand fault conditions, and ultimately safeguard personnel and property. This post will explore some of the key equations, formulas, and underlying principles involved in these crucial calculations. Key Concepts and Equations: When performing short-circuit calculations, several factors and formulas come into play. Here are some essential ones: Transformer Impedance: It's important to note that transformer impedance is often based on the transformer's self-ventilated rating (e.g., the OA base is used for ONAN/ONAF/OFAF transformers). Voltage Notation: Throughout these calculations, line-to-line voltage in kilovolts is represented as (kV)...
1 comment
Read more