Skip to main content

The Human Element: Integrating Human Factors into Process Safety Management

The Human Element: Integrating Human Factors into Process Safety Management


Introduction:

As the image aptly states, "Understanding human factors (errors) is critical to ensuring acceptable and controllable operational risk." In the realm of process safety management (PSM), this couldn't be truer. A facility's lifecycle, from design and construction to operation and maintenance, is deeply intertwined with human activities.







Recognizing that human error is inevitable, the focus of human factors studies within PSM is to manage these errors proactively, thereby maintaining an acceptable level of risk to personnel, property, and the environment. This post will delve into the essential elements and recommended guidelines for addressing human factors as a key component of process safety management.


The Critical Influence of Human Activity:


Human actions significantly shape the safety and reliability of industrial facilities. Errors can occur at any stage, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to understanding and mitigating human factors.


1. Required Elements for Addressing Human Factors:


1.1 Operator-Process/Equipment Interface:

  • Every facility must have a system to address human factors throughout the design, construction, and operational phases of projects.
  • A crucial aspect is the assessment of human interactions with the facility during the design process.
  • This assessment must specifically consider computerized control systems, which can potentially overload operators with information during abnormal conditions (alarm management).
  • The human factors assessment system should meticulously examine the following interfaces for potential issues:
    • Alarm display
    • Information display
    • Ergonomics
  • Task analyses are essential to anticipate potential failures during specific tasks, understand how human intervention can recover from these issues, and, if recovery fails, how to control the potential problem areas.


1.2 Administrative Control Versus Engineering Control:


  • Each facility needs a clear strategy outlining the use of administrative controls (e.g., procedures, training) versus engineering controls (e.g., interlocks, automation) in managing risks.

1.3 Human Error Assessment:


  • A comprehensive assessment of the potential for human errors must be conducted throughout the facility's lifecycle, including design, construction, commissioning, operation, and maintenance.
  • Facilities should have access to competent resources specializing in human error assessment.
  • Human factor reviews should consider various approaches to reduce human error, such as:
    • Written guidelines and procedures
    • Human factor audits
    • Written communications
    • Design of the operator-process/equipment interface

2. Recommended Guidelines for Enhancing Human Factors Management:

2.1 Operator-Process/Equipment Interface:

  • Human factors assessments should address potentially confusing aspects of equipment, including the positioning of dials, color coding inconsistencies, differing directions for on/off switches, cultural norms affecting interpretation, and the clarity of labeling.

2.2 Administrative Control Versus Engineering Control:


  • When administrative controls are chosen over engineering controls, the facility should implement a system to periodically review the effectiveness of these administrative controls to ensure they remain adequate over time.

2.3 Human Error Assessment:


  • While not explicitly detailed in the "recommended guidelines" section of this text, the overarching principle is to continuously improve the understanding and mitigation of human error.

3. Factors in Human Error Reviews:


Human error reviews should encompass a range of influencing factors, including:

  • Understanding
  • Judgment
  • Motivation
  • Education
  • Training
  • Stress
  • Fatigue
  • Cognition



My Experience:

In my work focusing on process safety management [cite: 1], the integration of human factors has been a critical element. For instance, when championing API/OSHA-compliant process safety standards [cite: 1], a significant part involved evaluating and improving the operator-process interface to minimize the potential for human error. This included reviewing alarm systems, control panel ergonomics, and the clarity of operating procedures. Recognizing the limitations of relying solely on administrative controls, the emphasis was always on implementing engineering controls where feasible and establishing robust review processes for administrative measures.





Conclusion:


Managing human error is paramount to achieving acceptable operational risk in high-hazard industries. By systematically addressing human factors through required elements like interface design and error assessment, and by adhering to recommended guidelines, facilities can significantly enhance their process safety performance. A thorough understanding of the factors influencing human error is essential for creating safer and more reliable operations.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding LV Earthing Systems: TT, TN, and IT Explained

Understanding LV Earthing Systems: TT, TN, and IT Explained Earthing systems are crucial for electrical safety, protecting people and equipment from faults and shocks. In low-voltage (LV) installations, the IEC 60364 standard defines three main earthing systems:  TT, TN, and IT , each with distinct characteristics and applications. This blog post explains these systems, their subtypes, and key safety considerations, referencing the attached technical screenshots for clarity. 1. Classification of LV Earthing Systems Earthing systems are identified by a  two-letter code : First Letter: Neutral Connection T (Terra)  – Neutral is  directly earthed  at the transformer. I (Isolated)  – Neutral is  not earthed  or connected via high impedance (≥1000 Ω). Second Letter: Equipment Earthing T  – Frames are  locally earthed , independent of the neutral. N  – Frames are  connected to the neutral , which is earthed at the transformer. 2. Typ...

Understanding Short-Circuit Analysis with ETAP and the IEC 60909 Standard

U nderstanding Short-Circuit Analysis with ETAP and the IEC 60909 Standard Introduction: Short-circuit analysis is a critical aspect of electrical power system design and safety. It involves calculating the magnitude of fault currents to ensure the proper selection of protective devices and to verify that equipment can withstand fault conditions. This post will discuss how ETAP software performs short-circuit analysis in compliance with the IEC 60909 standard, a key standard in this field. Why is IEC 60909 Important? The IEC 60909 standard provides a globally recognized framework for calculating short-circuit currents in AC power systems. [Ref: IEC 60909-0:2016] Its importance stems from several factors: Ensuring Safety: Accurate short-circuit calculations, as mandated by IEC 60909, are crucial for selecting appropriately rated protective devices (circuit breakers, fuses) that can safely interrupt fault currents. [Ref: Short Circuit Analysis (IEC 60909 Standard) : Extent & Requir...

Understanding Short-Circuit Calculations in Electrical Systems

U nderstanding Short-Circuit Calculations in Electrical Systems Introduction: Short-circuit calculations are fundamental to the design, protection, and safety of electrical systems. Determining the magnitude of fault currents allows engineers to select appropriate protective devices (like circuit breakers and fuses), ensure equipment can withstand fault conditions, and ultimately safeguard personnel and property. This post will explore some of the key equations, formulas, and underlying principles involved in these crucial calculations. Key Concepts and Equations: When performing short-circuit calculations, several factors and formulas come into play. Here are some essential ones: Transformer Impedance: It's important to note that transformer impedance is often based on the transformer's self-ventilated rating (e.g., the OA base is used for ONAN/ONAF/OFAF transformers). Voltage Notation: Throughout these calculations, line-to-line voltage in kilovolts is represented as (kV)...