Strategic Framework for the Development of a 50 MW Geothermal Power Plant in Yemen: A Comprehensive Project Management Guide

1. Executive Summary: A Framework for Strategic Energy Development in Yemen

This report outlines a comprehensive project management framework for the development, construction, and operation of a 50 MW geothermal power plant in Yemen. The proposed framework is structured to address the unique complexities of a large-scale energy infrastructure project in a fragile operating environment. It is based on a phased, gate-driven approach that systematically mitigates risk at each stage, from initial reconnaissance through to commercial operation. The core of this strategy lies in the adoption of a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, which is designed to distribute technical and financial risks between the public and private sectors. Key recommendations include prioritizing government-led exploration to de-risk the initial phases, leveraging international development partners for technical and financial support, and implementing a dedicated program for capacity building within the Public Electricity Corporation (PEC). The framework is presented as a detailed action tracking table, serving as a practical roadmap for all project stakeholders, assigning specific responsibilities for each task and deliverable.

2. Strategic Context: Geothermal Power in Yemen's Energy Landscape

2.1 Yemen's Energy Imperative: The Need for Stable and Resilient Power

The energy sector in Yemen faces significant challenges, marked by a severe supply deficit and a fragmented, aging infrastructure. The co

untry's total electrical energy output is approximately 1,150 MW, with a substantial portion of this capacity generated by old power stations that form the National Electric Network (NEN).1 The reliance on inefficient diesel and fuel oil-based plants, coupled with a transmission network of low availability, leaves a significant portion of the population un-electrified and unable to meet growing demand.1

International development efforts, such as the World Bank's Yemen Emergency Electricity Access Project (YEEAP), have successfully leveraged solar energy to provide urgently needed access to electricity in rural and peri-urban areas. These projects, which installed over 6 MWp of solar capacity and provided solar systems to 517 critical facilities, demonstrate the viability of foreign-supported energy initiatives and the government's focus on power sector restoration.2 While these solar solutions provide a rapid response to immediate needs, their intermittent nature necessitates a parallel strategy to secure a stable, baseload energy source capable of anchoring the national grid and supporting future expansion.

2.2 The Strategic Value of Geothermal vs. Intermittent Renewables

The integration of geothermal energy offers a compelling solution to Yemen's long-term energy security challenges. Unlike variable renewable resources such as solar and wind, whose energy production is subject to weather conditions, geothermal power plants exhibit exceptionally high-capacity factors, typically ranging from 70% to 90%.3 This consistency in energy production is critical for providing stable, round-the-clock baseload power, which is essential for a fragile grid suffering from low availability.1

Beyond simple power generation, geothermal plants can provide crucial ancillary services to the grid, including ramping, frequency response, and black-start capability.4 The ability to offer these services enhances the overall reliability and resilience of the power system, a capability that intermittent sources cannot provide alone. This means that a geothermal project’s true value extends beyond its Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), encompassing its role in strengthening the entire grid infrastructure.5 The fragmentation and inefficiency of Yemen's existing grid underscore the fundamental requirement for a stable baseload generator like a geothermal plant. The project, therefore, should not be viewed merely as a standalone generation asset but as a foundational pillar for grid stabilization and future network expansion. This requires a comprehensive project scope that includes a "grid readiness" component, addressing the integration challenges of the national transmission network.

2.3 Assessment of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Model

A Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model is an effective mechanism for distributing the substantial risks inherent in large-scale energy projects between the public and private sectors.6 The readiness of Yemen's institutions for such a model is a complex matter. On one hand, the existence of a dedicated PPP Unit within the Ministry of Planning and the documented readiness of both government agencies and the private sector to adopt PPPs for infrastructure projects suggest a strong political will and organizational willingness.7

However, the legal and regulatory framework for PPPs in Yemen remains under development, with a specific law on PPPs still being studied.9 This presents a significant regulatory risk, as the clear definition of resource ownership, licensing, and government obligations is crucial for attracting private investment.6 The absence of a finalized legal framework means that the project cannot rely on a generic set of rules. Instead, the legal and contractual agreements for this specific project must be meticulously and custom-structured to address all potential ambiguities and define the rights and duties of the developer.6 The high-level intent to engage in PPPs is clear, but the implementation requires careful, bespoke legal and contractual design to mitigate the risks associated with an evolving regulatory landscape.

3. Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities in the Project Framework

The successful implementation of this project hinges on a clear definition of roles and a collaborative framework among all key stakeholders. The following entities are integral to the project's success:

3.1 Government of Yemen (GoY) and Public Sector Entities

Ministry of Electricity and Energy (MoEE): The MoEE is the primary regulatory and policy-making authority.10 It is responsible for setting the national energy strategy, granting exploration and exploitation licenses, and overseeing the long-term development of the power sector.6
Public Electricity Corporation (PEC): As the "sole integrated electric utility" and main supplier of electrical power in Yemen, PEC is the most critical public sector partner.1 Its responsibilities span generation, transmission, and distribution. PEC will be the primary off-taker of the power generated by the plant, and its technical and organizational capacity to integrate the new energy source into the existing grid is a key consideration.1 The framework must acknowledge and address the organizational risks associated with PEC's current capacity.
General Investment Authority (GIA): The GIA serves as the main government agency for promoting investment and coordinating government support on behalf of investors.12 It will be the central liaison for the private sector consortium, facilitating bureaucratic processes and inter-ministerial coordination.

3.2 International and Partner Organizations

World Bank / International Development Association (IDA) / United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) / United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): These organizations have a proven track record of supporting energy and infrastructure projects in Yemen.2 Their involvement is crucial, as they can provide technical assistance, project financing, and grants to de-risk the initial, high-cost exploration phases, making the project more attractive to private investors.3

3.3 Private Sector Consortium

Geothermal Developer / Independent Power Producer (IPP): The IPP is the lead private sector entity, responsible for securing project financing and managing the overall project lifecycle. It bears the primary responsibility for technical execution, adherence to timelines, and commercial viability.
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) Contractor: The EPC contractor is responsible for the detailed engineering design, procuring all necessary equipment, and the physical construction of the power plant and associated infrastructure.7
Financial Institutions: These institutions provide the necessary equity and debt financing for the project. Their investment is contingent on a robust, bankable feasibility report, a clear regulatory environment, and a structured risk mitigation plan.6

A summary of these roles and their responsibilities is provided in the following table.

Table 3.4: Key Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities

Stakeholder	Role Description	Primary Responsibilities	Noted Risks/Dependencies
Ministry of Electricity and Energy (MoEE)	High-level government authority, policy and regulatory body.	Overall energy strategy, granting licenses, regulatory oversight, ensuring compliance with national policy.	Dependent on a clear legal framework. Lack of clarity poses regulatory risk to investors.6
Public Electricity Corporation (PEC)	Sole integrated electric utility, off-taker of power, grid operator.	Generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity. Negotiating Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and integrating the plant into the national grid.	Organizational and technical capacity risk. Insufficient infrastructure and capacity may hinder efficient operation and grid integration.1
General Investment Authority (GIA)	Government agency for investment promotion and coordination.	Promoting investment opportunities, coordinating government support on behalf of investors, and facilitating permits and approvals.	Requires clear authority to coordinate across various government ministries to be effective.12
International Development Partners (WB, UNDP, UNOPS)	Providers of technical assistance and financing.	De-risking early exploration phases through grants, providing technical expertise, and potentially offering project financing at favorable terms.	Requires a stable political and security environment to deploy resources and for project implementation.2
Private Sector Geothermal Developer / IPP	Lead project manager, responsible for overall execution.	Project financing, managing project lifecycle, and supervising all contractors and consultants.	Bears significant Resource and Completion Delay risks. Requires a bankable PPA and a stable regulatory environment.6
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) Contractor	Responsible for the physical delivery of the project.	Detailed design, equipment procurement, civil construction, and well field infrastructure.	Performance risk, dependent on a clear scope of work and timely delivery of materials.
Financial Institutions	Providers of project capital.	Conducting financial due diligence and providing equity and debt financing.	Credit risk of the off-taker (PEC), political risk, and currency convertibility risk.6

4. Project Management Framework: A Phased Approach

The development of a geothermal power plant follows a systematic, phased lifecycle to manage the inherent risks and costs.13 The proposed framework consists of six distinct phases, each with clear actions and deliverables.

4.1 Phase 1: Reconnaissance and Pre-Feasibility (Steps 1-3)

This phase is dedicated to the initial investigation and preliminary assessment of the geothermal resource. The primary objective is to evaluate the technical viability of the project before committing to high-cost drilling.

Actions:

Step 1: Gathering and evaluating existing data, including geological and hydrological information, maps, reports, and literature.13 This involves site visits to conduct initial assessments and to identify missing data.
Step 2A: Conducting detailed surface exploration. This includes geological-geothermal and structural mapping, as well as chemical analyses of thermal manifestations.13 Geophysical exploration is also conducted to create a broad conceptual model of the field.
Step 2B: Drilling of one to three exploration wells to test the results of the surface exploration and to refine the conceptual model.13
Step 3: Preparation of a Pre-Feasibility Report. This document synthesizes all data, provides an evaluation of the field's capacity, and includes a preliminary cost estimate.13

Deliverables:

A Reconnaissance Report that outlines the existing data, identifies knowledge gaps, and provides initial recommendations for further exploration.13
A Preliminary Conceptual Model of the geothermal field based on surface exploration data.13
An Exploration Drilling Report detailing the results of the initial wells and an updated conceptual model.13
A Pre-Feasibility Report containing a preliminary cost estimate, a basic process design, and recommendations for the next steps.13

Responsible Person/Authority: The high-risk nature and high cost of this initial exploration phase (exploration drilling is costly and fraught with uncertainties 3) are best managed by public sector entities with support from international development partners. Therefore, the
MoEE and PEC, with technical and financial assistance from the World Bank or UNDP, are the responsible authorities. This approach, where government agencies carry out publicly funded exploration, has a proven track record of reducing resource risk for private investors.6

4.2 Phase 2: Final Feasibility and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Steps 4-6)

This phase builds on the initial findings to provide a definitive assessment of the project's viability and its potential environmental and social impacts.

Actions:

Step 4: Conducting a comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Study (ESIS) for the power plant and its related infrastructure.13 This is a critical step for obtaining environmental permits and ensuring the project adheres to international standards.
Step 5: Drilling and testing of confirmation wells. The location of these wells is based on the findings of the pre-feasibility report, aiming to confirm the reservoir's capacity.13
Step 6: Preparation of the final Feasibility Report. This report updates the field capacity evaluation, refines the process design and fluid treatment plans, and provides a final, detailed cost estimate.13 The final feasibility report is a critical document for securing financing from private institutions.6

Deliverables:

An Environmental and Social Impact Study report and a corresponding management plan.13
A Feasibility Report that serves as a bankable document, providing a definitive assessment of the project's technical and economic viability.13

Responsible Person/Authority: The Private Sector Geothermal Developer (IPP) is the responsible party for this phase, as the deliverables are necessary for their financing and investment decisions. This entity will collaborate with the MoEE/PEC for regulatory and technical input.

4.3 Phase 3: Detailed Design, Financing, and Permitting (Part of Step 7)

With the project's feasibility confirmed, this phase focuses on securing the necessary capital and regulatory approvals while preparing detailed engineering plans.

Actions:

Securing Project Financing: The IPP will use the final Feasibility Report to attract and finalize financing from financial institutions.6 This involves negotiating loan and equity agreements.
Obtaining Licenses and Permits: All necessary licenses and permits, including the exploitation license, land use permits, and regulatory approvals, must be secured from the appropriate government agencies.6 The
GIA will be instrumental in coordinating this effort.12
Detailed Engineering Design: Based on the conceptual design from the feasibility report, the EPC contractor will prepare the detailed engineering designs for the power plant, well field, and transmission connections.13

Deliverables:

A signed Project Financing Agreement and a Lender's Due Diligence Report.
All regulatory approvals and permits, including the exploitation license.
The Detailed Engineering Design Report and tender documents for construction.13

Responsible Person/Authority: The Private Sector Geothermal Developer (IPP), working closely with its legal and financial teams. The GIA will provide essential governmental coordination, and the MoEE will issue the final permits.

4.4 Phase 4: Construction and Production Drilling (Part of Step 7)

This is the physical implementation phase where the power plant and well field are constructed.

Actions:

Civil Construction: The EPC contractor begins civil works for the power plant and auxiliary facilities.13
Equipment Manufacturing and Delivery: Equipment is manufactured off-site and delivered to the project location.13
Production and Reinjection Drilling: The drilling of production and reinjection wells is undertaken to ensure a stable supply of geothermal fluid to the plant.13 This is done under the supervision of the private developer.

Deliverables:

Periodic Construction Progress Reports detailing civil works and equipment delivery schedules.
The completed power plant structure and the installed well field infrastructure.

Responsible Person/Authority: The EPC Contractor holds primary responsibility for the construction and installation, with overall supervision from the Private Sector Geothermal Developer (IPP) and quality control from the MoEE/PEC.

4.5 Phase 5: Commissioning, Testing, and Grid Integration (Step 8)

This phase focuses on bringing the power plant online, ensuring it operates safely and effectively, and integrating it with the national grid.

Actions:

Testing and Commissioning: All mechanical, electrical, and control systems of the power plant are tested to ensure they function as designed.13
Staff Training: The operational staff, which will include personnel from PEC, are trained on the plant's operation and maintenance.13
Grid Integration and Modeling: The plant is connected to the grid, and grid integration modeling is performed to assess its impact on voltage and frequency performance and to ensure it can provide ancillary services.4

Deliverables:

A Commissioning Report detailing the results of all tests and confirming successful startup.13
Operational and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals and Staff Training Certificates.13
A Grid Integration Analysis Report that outlines the plant’s operational plan to provide stability and ancillary services to the grid.4

Responsible Person/Authority: The EPC Contractor and the future Operations and Maintenance team (likely a joint venture between the private developer and PEC) are jointly responsible. PEC's direct involvement in this phase is essential for building local capacity and addressing organizational risks.6

4.6 Phase 6: Commercial Operation and Maintenance (Step 9)

The final phase transitions the project from a construction site to a fully operational power plant. The focus shifts to long-term sustainability, revenue generation, and future growth.

Actions:

Continuous Operation: The plant operates to generate and supply power to the grid under the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).13
Monitoring and Maintenance: Continuous monitoring of the plant's performance, along with routine and predictive maintenance using smart technologies.3
Performance and Revenue Tracking: Regular reporting on power generation, capacity factors, and financial performance.3

Deliverables:

Monthly Performance Reports and Annual Performance Audits.
An updated O&M Plan incorporating predictive maintenance strategies.

Responsible Person/Authority: The Operations and Maintenance company, which is likely a joint venture between the Private Sector Partner and PEC.

5. Geothermal Project Financial Lifecycle and Cash Flow

The financial journey of a geothermal power project is defined by a unique cash flow profile driven by its distinct phases of development. Unlike conventional power plants, a geothermal project requires a significant and risky capital investment in the early stages to confirm the viability of the resource. A typical project's financial life cycle can be visualized as a multi-stage cash flow diagram, with distinct periods of high investment, followed by a long-term revenue stream.

5.1 Cash Flow Diagram Description

A cash flow diagram for a geothermal project would generally show the following stages:

Initial Investment (Exploration & Confirmation Phases): The project begins with a deep, negative cash flow. This period is dominated by high-risk, upfront capital expenditures for reconnaissance, geological and geophysical surveys, and most critically, exploratory and confirmation drilling.16 This early investment is necessary to reduce the resource uncertainty that deters private investors.17 The success of these early phases is a prerequisite for a "go/no-go" decision to proceed with the project.17
Construction Investment (Project Finance & Construction Phase): Assuming the resource is confirmed, the project enters a second period of significant negative cash flow. This stage involves the capital costs for detailed engineering, procurement of equipment with long lead times, and the physical construction of the power plant and associated infrastructure.17 The cash outflows during this period are substantial but are based on a more certain technical and financial outlook provided by the feasibility study.17
Revenue Generation (Operation & Expansion Phase): Upon completion of construction and successful commissioning, the project's cash flow turns positive. Revenues are generated from the sale of electricity to the national utility under the terms of a long-term Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).17 A portion of these revenues is used to repay project debt and cover ongoing operational expenses, such as maintenance and labor.16 Given the exceptionally high-capacity factor of geothermal plants, this revenue stream is typically stable and predictable.17
Long-Term Operation: The positive cash flow continues throughout the plant's operational life. Operational expenses, while relatively low compared to fossil fuel plants, are ongoing and include costs for reservoir management and, if necessary, make-up well drilling to sustain production.16 The long-term stability of the revenue allows the project to generate a return for investors. Financial analysis of these projects often uses discounted cash flow analysis to evaluate the project's economic viability and determine a levelized breakeven price for the power generated.16

6. Risk Management and Mitigation Strategies

The successful implementation of this project requires a proactive approach to managing the inherent risks. The following table details the key risks and the corresponding mitigation strategies.

Table 6.1: Geothermal Project Risk and Mitigation Matrix

Risk Category	Specific Risk	Potential Impact	Mitigation Strategy	Responsible Authority
Technical / Resource Risk	High uncertainty of resource availability or size.3	Project failure or reduced power output, leading to significant financial losses.	Government-led, publicly-funded exploration in early phases to reduce risk for private investors. Use of advanced technologies and modeling.3	MoEE/PEC with support from International Development Partners.
Political and Organizational Risk	Political instability and lack of institutional preparedness, particularly within PEC.1	Project delays, inefficient operations, and inability to integrate with the grid.	Secure long-term, structured agreements with government guarantees. Implement a dedicated workstream for PEC capacity building and training from the project's inception.	MoEE/PEC, Private Sector Developer, and International Partners.
Regulatory and Permitting Risk	Ambiguities in laws regarding resource ownership, licenses, and sovereign obligations.6 PPP law is still under study.9	Delays in permitting, potential for license cancellation, and lack of legal recourse.	Establish a joint public-private legal task force to draft and secure bespoke project agreements and a special law for this project to mitigate the lack of a formal PPP framework.9	Private Developer, MoEE, and GIA.
Financial Risk	Currency convertibility risk, as capital costs are in foreign currency while revenue is in local currency.6	Inability to repatriate profits and repay foreign-denominated loans.	Secure long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with currency indexation clauses. Explore financing from International Development Banks with currency hedging mechanisms.	Private Developer, Financial Institutions.
Completion Delay Risk	Delays in construction due to unforeseen circumstances, supply chain issues, or security concerns.6	Cost overruns, loss of revenue, and failure to meet project deadlines.	Implement a comprehensive project schedule with clear milestones. Secure robust insurance policies, including force majeure clauses, to cover potential delays from human-made events or natural disasters.6	EPC Contractor, Private Developer.

7. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The development of a 50 MW geothermal power plant in Yemen is not merely an energy project but a strategic initiative to build a foundation for a more resilient and stable national grid. The analysis confirms that a phased project management framework, coupled with a carefully structured Public-Private Partnership, is the most effective approach to navigating the technical, political, and financial complexities of this endeavor.

Based on the detailed framework and risk assessment, the following recommendations are critical for ensuring the project's success:

Prioritize Early De-Risking: The single most important action is to secure grants from international development partners to fund the high-risk, initial reconnaissance and exploration phases. This government-led effort will provide the definitive data required to attract and secure private sector investment, which is otherwise deterred by the high upfront costs and resource uncertainty.3
Formalize the PPP Framework: While the project can proceed with bespoke legal agreements, its long-term success and ability to attract future investment depend on a clear, established regulatory environment. This project should be used as a pilot to work with the PPP Unit within the Ministry of Planning to finalize the legal and regulatory framework for large-scale energy projects, creating a stable foundation for future infrastructure development.
Invest in Capacity Building: The project must include a dedicated workstream for strengthening the technical and organizational capabilities of the Public Electricity Corporation (PEC). Given PEC's critical role as both the off-taker and grid operator, its ability to effectively manage and integrate the new baseload capacity is a significant factor in the project's long-term success and value to the national grid.1
Adopt a Holistic Valuation: The project's value should be assessed not solely on a simple metric like Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) but on its comprehensive contribution to grid stability, energy resilience, and national energy security.5 This broader perspective justifies the strategic investment and positions the project as a cornerstone of Yemen's future energy landscape.
Foster Multilateral Partnerships: The involvement of experienced international partners like the World Bank, UNDP, and others is essential to provide financial resources, technical expertise, and a degree of political stability to the project. Their support can mitigate multiple risks and ensure adherence to international best practices.

Works cited

PEC: integrated energy firm which can light up Yemen - Oil & Gas News (OGN), accessed September 7, 2025, https://ognnews.com/Article/37470/PEC_integrated_energy_firm_which_can_light_up_Yemen
Boosting Access to Affordable Solar Energy in Yemen - World Bank, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2022/07/18/-boosting-access-to-affordable-solar-energy-in-yemen
Summary of phases in geothermal project cycle - ResearchGate, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Summary-of-phases-in-geothermal-project-cycle_tbl3_334988672
Grid Integration Modeling for Geothermal Power - NREL, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.nrel.gov/geothermal/grid-integration-modeling
Geothermal Grid Integration - NREL, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.nrel.gov/geothermal/grid-integration
Geothermal fact sheet for promoting PPP -Risks and mitigation measures - UNIDO Downloads Server, accessed September 7, 2025, https://downloads.unido.org/ot/32/09/32095952/Geothermal%20fact%20sheet%20for%20promoting%20PPP%20-Risks%20and%20mitigation%20measures.pdf
(PDF) READINESS TO ADOPT PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN YEMEN - ResearchGate, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262559243_READINESS_TO_ADOPT_PUBLIC-PRIVATE_PARTNERSHIP_PPP_IN_HOUSING_DEVELOPMENT_IN_YEMEN
Country Profile: Yemen | Public Private Partnership - World Bank PPP, accessed September 7, 2025, https://ppp.worldbank.org/country-profile-yemen
Legal Framework - Yemen - United Nations Development Programme, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.undp.org/yemen/about-us/legal-framework
Republic of Yemen - Energy Charter, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Occasional/Yemen_Investment_Report.pdf
Yemen : energy efficiency institutional framework and 3-year DSM/EE action plan (English), accessed September 7, 2025, https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/637361468181746454/yemen-energy-efficiency-institutional-framework-and-3-year-dsm-ee-action-plan
Yemen - State.gov - State Department, accessed September 7, 2025, https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2014/229110.htm
Phases of geothermal development - ESMAP, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.esmap.org/sites/default/files/esmap-files/Flovenz%20Day%201%20-WB-2-phases-final.pdf
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DEVELOPMENT, accessed September 7, 2025, https://rafhladan.is/bitstream/handle/10802/28364/UNU-GTP-SC-28-1004.pdf?sequence=1
(PDF) Stages of a Integrated Geothermal Project - ResearchGate, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332181663_Stages_of_a_Integrated_Geothermal_Project
Evolution of Technical and Economical Decision Making in Geothermal Energy Projects - GW Engineering, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www2.seas.gwu.edu/~dorpjr/Publications/ConferenceProceedings/GRC2005.pdf
Geothermal Project Finance → Term - Energy → Sustainability Directory, accessed September 7, 2025, https://energy.sustainability-directory.com/term/geothermal-project-finance/
Global Geothermal Development Plan - ESMAP, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.esmap.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/ggdp-fact-sheet_mar-2017-v2_optimized.pdf
Geothermal Development Publications | ESMAP, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.esmap.org/node/158025
Geothermal loan guaranty cash flow model: description and users' manual, accessed September 7, 2025, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1183758/

Oil and Gas Technical Expertise

Search This Blog