The Electrophysics of Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Systems

The Electrophysics of Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Systems: Impedance-Induced Instability and the Perception of Weak Grids via Long Transmission Corridors

A fundamental paradox of modern renewable energy integration is that some of the largest solar plants are built in areas adjacent to strong grid hubs, yet they struggle to stay online due to the grid being "weak." This phenomenon is not a reflection of a physical lack of infrastructure or a deterioration of the local network, but rather a dynamic limitation imposed by electrical distance and the accumulation of impedance over long transmission corridors.1 Large utility-scale solar farms are frequently sited in remote, sun-rich regions far from load centers. Connecting a remote 500 MW solar plant back to a robust 6000 MVA system requires massive high-voltage transmission lines that often stretch 100 km or more.4 Those kilometers of conductor introduce a high-reactance barrier. From the perspective of the power-electronic inverter—the heart of the solar plant—this long line acts as a choke point that throttles the amount of "strength" (in the form of fault current) the strong grid can provide. This transition from a stiff voltage source to a high-impedance, volatile connection defines the "weak grid illusion".5

Quantifying the Weak Grid Illusion through Short Circuit Analysis

The measurement of grid strength at a specific point is traditionally quantified by the Short Circuit Ratio (SCR). The SCR serves as a "grid stiffness speedometer," indicating the ratio of the fault current (MVA) a grid can provide to the plant's rated power (MW).3 In conventional power systems dominated by synchronous generators, a high SCR indicates that the generator represents a small portion of the power available, meaning the generator's internal problems or power fluctuations cannot significantly affect the grid's voltage stability.3 However, as the electrical distance increases between the generator and the stiff grid, the available fault current drops, and the SCR collapses.

The Mathematical Breakdown of Transmission Impedance

To understand why a long transmission line causes a solar plant to "perceive" a weak grid, one must examine the Thevenin equivalent circuit. Consider a 500 MW solar plant connected to a 6000 MVA strong grid via a 100 km transmission line [Image 3]. The internal impedance of the strong grid itself is relatively low. For example, a 6000 MVA grid equivalent might have an impedance () of only .

When a 100 km line with a typical inductive reactance of is introduced, it adds a dominant reactance barrier. The mathematical transformation of grid strength can be visualized as follows:

1. The Transmission Line Reactance ():
   A 100 km line contributes:
   
   [Image 3]

2. The Total Impedance Seen by the Inverter ():
   The total impedance at the inverter terminals is the sum of the strong grid equivalent and the added line reactance:
   
   
   
   

3. The Drop in Short-Circuit Level ():
   The available fault current is inversely proportional to the impedance. The new short-circuit power () is:
   
   
   8

4. The Resulting SCR:
   
   
   

In this scenario, the grid did not fundamentally change, but the high reactance of the 100 km transmission line choked the 6000 MVA strength down to 750 MVA. An SCR of 1.5 is categorized as "very weak," placing the solar plant at a high risk of instability.5

Categorization of System Strength via SCR

Industry standards, including those provided by NERC and various system operators like ERCOT, provide a framework for interpreting these ratios to assess risk.3

SCR Value	Grid Strength	Stability Risk and Description
	Strong	The grid is "stiff." Voltage remains stable when the inverter injects or absorbs power. Minimal control issues.3
	Weak	Stability issues are likely. Detailed electromagnetic transient (EMT) studies are required to ensure the inverter remains stable.5
	Very Weak	High risk of instability. Standard controls often fail; advanced control strategies (GFM) or hardware mitigation (Syncons) are necessary.5

The Inverter control Loop and the Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) Bottleneck

Most utility-scale solar inverters are designed as Grid-Following (GFL) devices. These inverters do not operate as independent voltage sources; instead, they function as "current sources" that depend on measuring the existing grid voltage’s precise waveform and phase to time the injection of active and reactive current.9 This dependence is the core reason why high impedance is perceived as "weakness."

Mechanism of the Phase-Locked Loop (PLL)

The GFL control loop relies on a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) to continuously track the grid voltage's phase angle ().11 In a strong grid, the voltage at the Point of Interconnection (POI) is rigid, allowing the PLL to lock onto a stable signal. However, in a weak grid environment (high ), the terminal voltage becomes highly sensitive to the inverter's own current injection.14

Illustrative Diagram: The GFL Feedback Loop in a Weak Grid

When the solar plant experiences minor power fluctuations due to irradiance shifts or faults, the current injection changes. In a high-impedance network, this causes the POI voltage to swing violently in both magnitude and phase.10 The PLL, attempting to track a volatile and constantly moving phase angle, can experience a "loss of synchronism." If the voltage phase angle jumps faster than the PLL can adjust (a phenomenon known as a phase jump), the inverter "loses its grip" on the grid and must trip offline for protection to prevent damage to its power electronics.16

The Impact of the X/R Ratio on Stability

The ratio of reactive to real impedance () is another critical factor in how the solar plant perceives grid stability. While transmission lines are primarily inductive (high ), distribution feeders or extremely long lines with resistive components present different challenges.8

• High X/R (> 3.5): Typically associated with strong transmission zones. The higher inductive component results in a larger system time constant (), which opposes rapid variations and allows for more effective frequency and voltage control.21

• Low X/R (≤ 1.0): Often seen in resistive "weak" distribution grids. In these systems, active power () injection becomes strongly coupled to the voltage magnitude (). A solar plant attempting to implement frequency-watt droop control in a low environment finds the control less efficient, as changes in active power cause significant voltage deviations rather than primarily affecting the phase angle.21

Dynamic Instability and Resonant Phenomena

The perception of a weak grid is further complicated by resonant interactions that occur at frequencies below the fundamental grid frequency (60 Hz). These interactions can lead to sustained oscillations that threaten the safety of the power system.4

Open-Loop Modal Resonance (OLMR)

Research into grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) farms has shown that they can cause power system oscillations under the condition of Open-Loop Modal Resonance (OLMR).4 Studies of regional power networks in Western China revealed oscillations of approximately 1 Hz caused by PV connections, necessitating the disassembly of power stations.4 The strength of the OLMR increases directly with the electrical distance (impedance) between the PV farm and the main grid. When multiple PV farms are connected in close electrical proximity at the end of a long line, the interactions between their controllers intensify, leading to growing power oscillations that can trigger cascading trips.4

Fault-Induced Instability

During a 3-phase fault on a long transmission line, the voltage at the inverter terminals can drop to zero. GFL inverters are required to have Fault Ride-Through (FRT) capability, meaning they must remain connected for a specific duration (e.g., 150 ms) to support grid recovery.23 However, in a weak grid, the post-fault recovery phase is treacherous. As the fault clears, the grid voltage phase angle may have shifted significantly. The GFL PLL, struggling to re-synchronize while the voltage is still recovering, often oscillates wildly post-fault.16 This "GFL collapse" is a primary reason why remote solar plants trip even after the initial fault has been successfully cleared by the utility’s protection systems.16

Hardware Solutions for Bridging Electrical Distance

To overcome the weak grid illusion and "shorten" the electrical distance, engineers deploy physical hardware solutions that either inject strength locally or modify the transmission line’s impedance.

Synchronous Condensers (Syncons): The Heavyweight Solution

A synchronous condenser is a rotating synchronous machine (similar to a generator) that spins freely without a prime mover. By installing a high-inertia mass close to the solar plant's POI, engineers are physically injecting strength and fault current in parallel to the high-impedance remote grid.3

Feature	Synchronous Condenser Impact
Short-Circuit MVA	Directly increases the available fault current at the POI, raising the SCR.3
System Inertia	Provides physical, rotational inertia that resists rapid changes in frequency (RoCoF).26
Voltage Regulation	Continuously generates or absorbs reactive power to hold grid voltage steady during disturbances.26
Fault Ride-Through	Remains connected even during zero-voltage contingencies, providing smooth support.26

The installation of synchronous condensers has been successfully used in the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) to mitigate sub-synchronous oscillations and allow for the better integration of renewable sources in weak grid corridors.30

Series Capacitive Compensation: Modifying Line Impedance

Since the fundamental problem is the high inductive reactance () of the 100 km line, engineers can physically modify the line's impedance. By installing series capacitor banks on the transmission towers, capacitive reactance () is used to cancel a portion of the line's inherent inductance.32

The degree of series compensation () is defined as:

Typically, is kept between 25% and 75%.32 Reducing the effective reactance () "shortens" the electrical distance, allowing the strong grid's fault current to flow more easily to the plant terminals, thereby raising the SCR.32

However, series compensation introduces a risk of sub-synchronous oscillations. The combination of line inductance and series capacitors creates a resonant circuit with a natural frequency () that is a subharmonic of the grid frequency:

32 If these sub-synchronous frequencies interact with the solar inverter’s control loops, they can cause sustained electrical oscillations.30

Software Solutions: The Grid-Forming (GFM) Paradigm

The most modern and transformative solution moves "strength" from a spinning physical shaft into the inverter's software code. Standard inverters use GFL controls, but emerging Grid-Forming (GFM) inverters change the control paradigm from following the grid to establishing the grid.9

The Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM) Fix

To enable an electronic inverter to stabilize a weak grid, advanced GFM inverters simulate the dynamics of a physical synchronous machine using a mathematical model of the Swing Equation.11 This approach is often called the Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM) topology.

The GFM Swing Equation:

39

Where:

• (Inertia): A virtual inertia term that dictates how the inverter resists the initial Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF).39

• (Damping): A term that dampens power oscillations and determines the steady-state frequency deviation.39

Unlike GFL inverters, GFM inverters act as a Voltage Source.38 They dictate the local grid frequency and phase internally rather than hunting for an external phase signal via a PLL.9 This makes them immune to the PLL-induced instability that plagues GFL units in weak grids. Dynamic simulations show that during a severe 3-phase fault, while a GFL inverter collapses and trips, a GFM inverter using VSM control resists the initial phase angle jump, catches the deviation, and achieves a controlled, stable recovery back to nominal voltage and frequency.43

The Role of BESS and Headroom Requirements

Grid-forming capability is frequently integrated with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) because GFM duties often require a "headroom" or energy buffer to provide synthetic inertia.9 When a frequency disturbance occurs, a GFM BESS must rapidly inject or absorb active power (MW) to slow the RoCoF.31

If a BESS is already operating at its maximum discharge limit, it lacks the headroom to provide additional power for inertial support, which can reduce its effectiveness in stabilizing a weak grid.45 Furthermore, providing these services can lead to thermal stress on the inverter components, as emulating inertia requires short bursts of high current (often 1.1–2.0 p.u.) during transients.3

Capability	Grid-Following (GFL)	Grid-Forming (GFM)
Operating Mode	Current Source.9	Voltage Source.9
Synchronization	Needs a stiff grid to track via PLL.10	Establishes its own phase/frequency.10
Weak Grid Performance	Prone to PLL instability and tripping.16	Anchors weak grids and rides through faults.10
Inertia Support	No inherent or limited inertia.9	Provides virtual inertia via VSM/Swing Eq.9
Hardware Requirement	Standard.9	May require BESS and current headroom.9

Comparative Analysis of Stability Mitigation Strategies

Choosing the right solution for a remote solar farm depends on the specific nature of the weak grid perception (e.g., whether it is a lack of fault current, a lack of inertia, or resonance issues).

Solution	Mechanism of Mitigation	Best Use Case
Synchronous Condenser	Increases and adds physical inertia.26	Remote corridors with extremely low SCR (< 1.5).26
Series Capacitor	Reduces electrical distance ().32	Very long transmission lines (> 150 km).32
GFM Inverters	Software-driven "software fix" to hardware impedance.9	High-penetration renewable grids needing fast inertia.10
STATCOMs	Fast reactive power support.26	Voltage regulation and flicker mitigation.3

For instance, while STATCOMs are excellent for voltage regulation, they do not provide the fault current or physical inertia inherent in synchronous condensers.26 In contrast, GFM inverters can provide "synthetic" versions of these services at a much lower capital cost, as the cost of building a GFM-capable battery is now virtually the same as a GFL battery.31

The Convergence of Standards and Future Outlook

The perception of a weak grid is a dynamic limitation that is increasingly being addressed through updated interconnection standards, such as IEEE 2800.5 These standards are moving the industry toward a requirement that solar plants be "active grid stabilizers" rather than passive participants that trip during disturbances.9

Future grid stability will likely rely on a portfolio approach. This includes:

1. Wide-Area Monitoring Systems (WAMS): Using synchrophasor technology (PMUs) to monitor grid dynamics and frequency at cycles much faster than traditional SCADA.29

2. Coordinated Control: Shifting from local control to a "zonal perspective," where clustered solar plants at the end of a long line are controlled as a single aggregate entity to prevent "common-node conflicts" where inverters compete for voltage control.29

3. Hybrid Stability Designs: Integrating physical synchronous condensers with grid-forming BESS to combine the massive fault current of rotating mass with the millisecond-fast response of power electronics.9

Conclusion: Bridging the Impedance Gap

The "weak grid" perceived by remote solar plants is not a permanent state of the local network but a consequence of the impedance introduced by the long transmission lines required to harvest sun in isolated areas. The high reactance of these corridors acts as a buffer that separates the inverter from the stabilizing influence of the strong grid hubs. This separation creates a feedback loop that challenges the fundamental synchronization mechanisms—specifically the Phase-Locked Loop—of standard grid-following inverters.

As the energy transition replaces synchronous mass with power electronics, the definition of system strength must evolve from merely measuring "available fault current" to ensuring "control stability." The solution to the weak grid perception relies on shortening the electrical distance through physical means like series compensation, injecting localized strength through synchronous condensers, or redefining the inverter's identity through grid-forming software. By leveraging these advanced modeling tools and mitigation strategies, the power industry can confidently bridge the gap between remote renewable resources and the centers of human demand, turning potentially unstable corridors into resilient, self-supporting segments of the modern electrical grid.

Works cited

1. Distance Limitations for Solar Panels: A Comprehensive Analysis - SOROTEC, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.soropower.com/distance-limitations-for-solar-panels-a-comprehensive-analysis/

2. Evaluating grid strength under uncertain renewable generation (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1902638

3. Short circuit ratio (electrical grid) - Wikipedia, accessed March 12, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_circuit_ratio_(electrical_grid)

4. Impact of Electrical Connection Distance on the Open Loop Modal Resonance of Grid Connected Photovoltaic Farms - Frontiers, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.872143/full

5. Short-Circuit Ratios in Electric Grids with High Shares of Power Electronics: Renewables, AI Data Centers, and Grid-Forming BESS - Tom Scaramellino, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.tomscaramellino.com/post/short-circuit-ratios-in-electric-grids-with-high-shares-of-power-electronics-renewables-ai-data-centers-and-grid-forming-bess

6. System strength shortfall challenges for renewable energy-based power systems: A review - Edith Cowan University, accessed March 12, 2026, https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3818&context=ecuworks2022-2026

7. Practical Guide to Calculate Short Circuit Ratio (SCR) - Shuvangkar Das' Blog, accessed March 12, 2026, https://blog.shuvangkardas.com/SCR-calculation-step-by-step-practical-guide

8. Power System Studies - Grid Impedance Ratio and Short Circuit Ratio - PSMA Consulting, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.psmaconsulting.com/power-system-studies/modern-power-systems/grid-impedance-ratio-and-short-circuit-ratio

9. What Is Grid-Forming vs Grid-Following Control? - Bess Manufacturer | HT Infinite Power, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.infinitepowerht.com/grid-forming-and-grid-following.html

10. Grid Forming Inverter vs Grid Following | Stability Essentials ..., accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.opal-rt.com/blog/mastering-grid-forming-vs-grid-following-in-real-time-testing/

11. Grid-Forming and Grid-Supporting Inverter Control in Modern Power Systems - ManTech Publications, accessed March 12, 2026, https://admin.mantechpublications.com/index.php/JoPED/issue/download/11583/13214

12. Comparison of Grid Following and Grid Forming | PDF - Scribd, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/763573277/Comparison-of-Grid-Following-and-Grid-Forming

13. Stability Analysis of a Weak-Grid-Connected Voltage-Sourced Rectifier Considering the Phase-Locked Loop Dynamics | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360120575_Stability_Analysis_of_a_Weak-Grid-Connected_Voltage-Sourced_Rectifier_Considering_the_Phase-Locked_Loop_Dynamics

14. Effect of PLL Bandwidth on Stability of Grid-Tied Inverter under Grid Impedance Variations, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391609313_Effect_of_PLL_Bandwidth_on_Stability_of_Grid-Tied_Inverter_under_Grid_Impedance_Variations

15. Analysis of phase-locked loop low-frequency stability in three-phase grid-connected power converters considering impedance interactions - Oak Ridge National Laboratory, accessed March 12, 2026, https://impact.ornl.gov/en/publications/analysis-of-phase-locked-loop-low-frequency-stability-in-three-ph/

16. RMS-Based PLL Stability Limit Estimation Using Maximum Phase Error for Power System Planning in Weak Grids - MDPI, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/19/1/281

17. Evaluation of the use of short-circuit ratio as a system strength indicator in converter-dominated power systems - Lirias, accessed March 12, 2026, https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/c891bf7e-edb8-4fd7-a7cf-3c21e68dd93e

18. Impact of Phase-Locked Loop Control on the Stability of a High Inverter Penetration Power System - ResearchGate, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338948672_Impact_of_Phase-Locked_Loop_Control_on_the_Stability_of_a_High_Inverter_Penetration_Power_System

19. Evaluating the Inherent Cyber Resilience of Inverter-based Microgrids against PLL Attacks Under Fault Conditions - KAUST Repository, accessed March 12, 2026, https://repository.kaust.edu.sa/bitstreams/bff15663-19ed-42e0-915d-e4073500fa19/download

20. PLL Frequency Stability Enhancement under Weak Grid Considering Reactive Current Support - IEEE Xplore, accessed March 12, 2026, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel8/7873789/10946684/10932741.pdf

21. Impact of Impedances and Solar Inverter Grid Controls in Electric ..., accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/21/5503

22. Block diagram of the swing equation of the proposed method. - ResearchGate, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Block-diagram-of-the-swing-equation-of-the-proposed-method_fig6_352666601

23. Three-phase phase-locked loop synchronization algorithms for grid-connected renewable energy systems A review - Aalborg Universitets forskningsportal, accessed March 12, 2026, https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/273236528/PLL_Review_RSER.pdf

24. PLL Synchronization Transient Stability Analysis of a Weak-Grid Connected VSC During Asymmetric Faults | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375731940_PLL_Synchronization_Transient_Stability_Analysis_of_a_Weak-Grid_Connected_VSC_During_Asymmetric_Faults

25. Transient Stability Enhancement Strategy for Grid-Following Inverter Based on Improved Phase-Locked Loop and Energy Dissipation - MDPI, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/17/3520

26. Synchronous Condensers - ENTSO-e, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.entsoe.eu/technopedia/techsheets/synchronous-condenser/

27. Synchronous condenser (SynCon) for grid stability and efficiency - Siemens Energy, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.siemens-energy.com/global/en/home/products-services/product/synchronous-condenser.html

28. Evaluation of Synchronous Condensers in Modern Power Grids for Enhancing Grid Stability - Chalmers ODR, accessed March 12, 2026, https://odr.chalmers.se/bitstreams/4708bce2-a781-495e-b9a2-8b62bf9262bb/download

29. Shunt- Connected FACTS and Synchronous Condensers, accessed March 12, 2026, https://inl.gov/content/uploads/2024/03/Shunt-Connected-FACTS-and-Synchronous-Condensers.pdf

30. Impact of Synchronous Condensers' Ratings on Mitigating Subsynchronous Oscillations in Wind Farms - Aalborg Universitets forskningsportal, accessed March 12, 2026, https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/761479045/energies-17-01730-v2.pdf

31. ​The rise of grid-forming batteries in the NEM - Research | Modo Energy, accessed March 12, 2026, https://modoenergy.com/research/australia-nem-grid-forming-battery-energy-storage-explainer

32. Application Note - Series Compensated Line Protection: Evaluation & Solutions - GE Vernova, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.gevernova.com/grid-solutions/sites/default/files/resources/products/applications/ger3736.pdf

33. PSCAD Cookbook Series Compensation Study, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.pscad.com/uploads/knowledge_base/chapter_9_series_compensation_study.pdf

34. The effect of series compensation on the basic factors, determinin - ReferenceGlobe, accessed March 12, 2026, http://referenceglobe.com/kpsslp/support/upload_videos/5-series-compensation_1588065783.pdf

35. Reactive power (VAR) compensation techniques in high voltage transmission lines - Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, accessed March 12, 2026, http://gjeta.com/sites/default/files/GJETA-2023-0113.pdf

36. Series Compensation in The Transmission Line | PDF | Capacitor | Electronics - Scribd, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/659771106/Series-compensation-in-the-transmission-line

37. Power System Studies - Fixed Series Capacitor (FSC) Compensation - PSMA Consulting, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.psmaconsulting.com/power-system-studies/facts/fixed-series-capacitor-fsc-compensation

38. UNIFI's Grid-Forming (GFM) Inverter Reference Design: A Tutorial on Modeling, Control, and Experimental Implementation of - Power Electronics Lab, accessed March 12, 2026, https://johnsonlab.ece.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/GFM-Tutorial.pdf

39. swing equation modelling of gfl inverter and comparison of its damping and inertia with gfm - Spiral, accessed March 12, 2026, https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/860a5283-9515-4dff-8d92-f108da8b2fe6/content

40. Stability Assessment of Fully Inverter-Based Power Systems Using Grid-Forming Controls - Fraunhofer-Publica, accessed March 12, 2026, https://publica.fraunhofer.de/bitstreams/239eb2b2-0836-4464-a4d9-6cccde07111f/download

41. Grid-Forming Inverter (GFMI) - Imperix, accessed March 12, 2026, https://imperix.com/doc/implementation/grid-forming-inverter

42. Grid-Forming Battery Energy Storage Systems, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.esig.energy/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ESIG-GFM-BESS-brief-2025.pdf

43. Comparative frequency- and time-domain analysis of four grid-forming inverters: Droop, VSM, matching, and dVOC, accessed March 12, 2026, https://repository.kaust.edu.sa/bitstreams/073e5f35-1b02-4c54-8562-252e8471943a/download

44. Grid Forming Inverter Power Control Stability Analysis - IEEE Xplore, accessed March 12, 2026, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel8/6287639/10380310/10636349.pdf

45. Quantifying Synthetic Inertia of a Grid-forming Battery Energy Storage System – Technical Note, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/files/initiatives/engineering-framework/2024/quantifying-synthetic-inertia-from-gfm-bess.pdf

46. INVERTER BASED RESOURCE (IBR) SERIES EPISODE 3 I PHASE LOCKED LOOP (PLL) LOSS OF SYNCHRONISM - YouTube, accessed March 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUD1gyQ4ApI

47. Battery Energy Storage System Grid Forming Controls (PAC-2024-2), accessed March 12, 2026, https://cdn.misoenergy.org/20241016%20PAC%20Item%2006d%20Battery%20Energy%20Storage%20System%20Grid%20Forming%20Controls%20(PAC-2024-2)653147.pdf